PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRLNX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRLNX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.41%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.


IRLNX

1D
0.79%
1M
8.20%
YTD
9.79%
6M
9.02%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
26.31%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
19.41%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRLNX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
9.79%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.92

The correlation between IRLNX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRLNX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRLNX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRLNXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.53

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.00

3.43

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.42

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.33

15.95

-4.62

IRLNX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRLNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRLNX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRLNXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.53

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.87

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.89

+0.04

Drawdowns

IRLNX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRLNXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.90%

-33.99%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.64%

-8.90%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-18.69%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-24.52%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.90%

-33.99%

+1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-3.69%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

1.91%

+3.11%

Volatility

IRLNX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that IRLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRLNXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

2.74%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

8.88%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

11.78%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

16.81%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.01%

+3.44%

IRLNX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRLNX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
18.81%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRLNX and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRLNX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRLNX dropped -32.90% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRLNX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer