PortfoliosLab logo
IRLNX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and FSPGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IRLNX:

0.16

FSPGX:

0.70

Sortino Ratio

IRLNX:

0.30

FSPGX:

1.02

Omega Ratio

IRLNX:

1.05

FSPGX:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

IRLNX:

0.11

FSPGX:

0.67

Martin Ratio

IRLNX:

0.29

FSPGX:

2.22

Ulcer Index

IRLNX:

8.42%

FSPGX:

7.05%

Daily Std Dev

IRLNX:

28.01%

FSPGX:

25.52%

Max Drawdown

IRLNX:

-38.99%

FSPGX:

-32.66%

Current Drawdown

IRLNX:

-15.05%

FSPGX:

-4.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a -11.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's -0.26% return.


IRLNX

YTD

-11.61%

1M

-4.25%

6M

-10.09%

1Y

4.19%

3Y*

12.24%

5Y*

11.49%

10Y*

11.83%

FSPGX

YTD

-0.26%

1M

7.54%

6M

0.63%

1Y

17.58%

3Y*

19.84%

5Y*

17.66%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IRLNX vs. FSPGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRLNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IRLNX is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IRLNX is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IRLNX is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IRLNX is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IRLNX is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IRLNX is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSPGX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IRLNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRLNX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than FSPGX's 0.37% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
11.39%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%4.86%0.99%1.23%1.14%1.21%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.37%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.47%1.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and FSPGX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.87%. This indicates that IRLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...