IRLNX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IRLNX returned 16.94%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for FSPGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IRLNX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 9.01% return.

IRLNX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: 26.31%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: 19.41%

FSPGX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: 25.69%
• 5Y*: 15.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	9.79%	18.20%	34.60%	46.01%	-30.06%	30.63%	38.32%	35.61%	-2.02%	30.08%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	9.01%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and FSPGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.96

The correlation between IRLNX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IRLNX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRLNX

IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 56
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRLNX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.93	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.60	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	1.83	+1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	6.14	+5.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRLNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRLNX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRLNX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.93	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.75	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.90	+0.04

Drawdowns

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRLNX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.90%	-32.66%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.64%	-16.17%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	-23.32%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.90%	-32.66%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-6.38%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	4.81%	+0.21%

Volatility

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.26%. This indicates that IRLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRLNX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	3.26%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	11.58%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	15.41%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.00%	21.49%	+0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.45%	21.55%	-0.10%

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRLNX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	18.81%	9.54%	3.55%	4.60%	11.22%	0.83%	4.18%	4.95%	3.70%	0.99%	1.23%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRLNX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

IRLNX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRLNX or FSPGX?

IRLNX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FSPGX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRLNX dropped -32.90% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.