PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRLNX vs. IIRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than IIRLX's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX has outperformed IIRLX with an annualized return of 19.41%, while IIRLX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.21% annualized return.


IRLNX

1D
0.79%
1M
8.20%
YTD
9.79%
6M
9.02%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
26.31%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
19.41%

IIRLX

1D
0.30%
1M
5.78%
YTD
11.03%
6M
11.26%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
16.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
9.79%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%
IIRLX
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio
11.03%18.77%26.95%29.41%-20.07%27.26%21.71%31.18%-3.45%22.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and IIRLX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

0.96

The correlation between IRLNX and IIRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRLNX vs. IIRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IIRLX
IIRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IIRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IIRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRLNXIIRLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.57

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.00

3.59

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.48

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

5.17

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.33

23.31

-11.98

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRLNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the IIRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRLNX and IIRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRLNXIIRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.57

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.62

+0.32

Drawdowns

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, smaller than the maximum IIRLX drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and IIRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRLNXIIRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.90%

-50.33%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.64%

-9.83%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-19.58%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-25.83%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.90%

-32.60%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-6.78%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

2.18%

+2.84%

Volatility

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) is 5.08%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that IRLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IIRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRLNXIIRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

6.14%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

10.67%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

13.58%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

17.77%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.52%

+2.93%

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IIRLX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRLNX vs. IIRLX - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, more than IIRLX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIRLX
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio
4.77%3.76%0.96%1.14%5.04%4.77%4.71%4.35%1.73%1.47%1.77%1.66%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
18.81%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IRLNX and IIRLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IIRLX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to IRLNX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRLNX dropped -32.90% vs IIRLX's -50.33%.

IIRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRLNX and IIRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer