IRCPX vs. BLNDX
IRCPX (Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, IRCPX returned 3.11%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for BLNDX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IRCPX charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.
Performance
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRCPX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 17.17% return.
IRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
BLNDX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 6M
- 18.61%
- 1Y
- 31.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- —
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRCPX Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio | 3.61% | 9.54% | 5.85% | 9.09% | -13.69% | 4.87% | 10.77% |
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 17.17% | 4.12% | 13.11% | 5.79% | 3.71% | 20.16% | 16.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRCPX and BLNDX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020 | 0.43 |
The correlation between IRCPX and BLNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (5 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRCPX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank
IRCPX
BLNDX
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRCPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.43 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 6.52 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.74 | 20.94 | -6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRCPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.44 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.83 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.06 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRCPX drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNDX drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRCPX and BLNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRCPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -17.69% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.54% | -4.75% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.29% | -17.69% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -17.69% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.14% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -3.19% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.50% | -0.73% |
Volatility
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) is 1.70%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that IRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRCPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 3.02% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | 9.51% | -6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 12.72% | -8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 11.66% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 11.75% | -5.93% |
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRCPX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRCPX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison
IRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.57%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 0.63% | 0.73% | 5.74% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 6.11% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IRCPX Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio | 16.57% | 17.17% | 4.99% | 4.01% | 13.97% | 4.50% | 4.29% | 4.59% | 2.93% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 5.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRCPX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNDX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to IRCPX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRCPX dropped -17.75% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.
IRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRCPX and BLNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer