IRBO vs. HUMN

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. IRBO is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. Over the past year, IRBO returned 69.58% vs 28.97% for HUMN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.

Performance

IRBO vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 45.29% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 6.76% return.

IRBO

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -4.46%
• 6M: 37.55%
• YTD: 45.29%
• 1Y: 69.58%
• 3Y*: 26.85%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: —

HUMN

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -9.84%
• 6M: 1.89%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 1Y: 28.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBO vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	45.29%	20.33%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	6.76%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and HUMN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.75

The correlation between IRBO and HUMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

IRBO vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IRBO	HUMN
Technology	83.8%	26.6%
Communication Services	5.5%	2.1%
Industrials	4.7%	38.4%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	17.4%
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.5%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.6%

Return for Risk

IRBO vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO

IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 75
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 31
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRBO	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	0.86	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	1.35	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.17	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	1.43	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	3.92	+7.25

IRBO vs. HUMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the HUMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBO and HUMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRBO	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-20.40%	-34.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.81%	-20.40%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.31%	-18.09%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-5.16%	-14.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.25%	7.41%	-1.16%

Volatility

IRBO vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) is 14.21%, while Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a volatility of 16.20%. This indicates that IRBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRBO	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.21%	16.20%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.21%	28.74%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.31%	33.86%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.85%	33.32%	-3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.40%	33.32%	-4.92%

IRBO vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRBO vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than HUMN's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.68%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	0.06%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRBO and HUMN in my portfolio?

IRBO and HUMN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRBO or HUMN?

HUMN has higher volatility (16.20%) compared to IRBO (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs HUMN's -20.40%.

Which ETF is better, IRBO or HUMN?

On 1-year performance, IRBO leads with 69.58% vs 28.97% for HUMN. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IRBO has been the lower-risk option at 14.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IRBO or HUMN?

Over the 1-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 69.58% return vs 28.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRBO or HUMN?

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRBO or HUMN?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.

What is the main difference between IRBO and HUMN?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.75% for HUMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.