IRBO vs. HUMN
IRBO (iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. IRBO is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.
Performance
IRBO vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 62.72% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 26.42% return.
IRBO
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- 62.72%
- 6M
- 59.32%
- 1Y
- 106.59%
- 3Y*
- 35.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- —
HUMN
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRBO vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF | 62.72% | 18.35% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 26.42% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRBO and HUMN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.73 |
IRBO vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRBO
HUMN
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
IRBO
HUMN
Communication Services
IRBO
HUMN
Industrials
IRBO
HUMN
Utilities
IRBO
HUMN
-
Consumer Cyclical
IRBO
HUMN
Real Estate
IRBO
HUMN
-
Consumer Defensive
IRBO
HUMN
-
Healthcare
IRBO
HUMN
-
Basic Materials
IRBO
-
HUMN
Energy
IRBO
-
HUMN
-
Financial Services
IRBO
-
HUMN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRBO vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank
IRBO
HUMN
IRBO vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRBO | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRBO | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.86 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
IRBO vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and HUMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRBO | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | -20.40% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -3.01% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.84% | -4.45% | -15.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | — | — |
Volatility
IRBO vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRBO | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.01% | 29.66% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.60% | 29.66% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 29.66% | -1.91% |
IRBO vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRBO vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison
IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IRBO iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRBO and HUMN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for IRBO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.75% for HUMN.
Find the right allocation for IRBO and HUMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer