IQSZ vs. WOMN
IQSZ (Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF) and WOMN (Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSZ is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while WOMN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index. IQSZ is actively managed, while WOMN is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQSZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WOMN.
Performance
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSZ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than WOMN's 2.64% return.
IQSZ
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WOMN
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 12.10% | 13.36% |
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF | 2.64% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSZ and WOMN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSZ vs. WOMN — Risk / Return Rank
IQSZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WOMN
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQSZ | WOMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSZ drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum WOMN drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSZ and WOMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSZ | WOMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -32.23% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -2.16% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -5.50% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSZ | WOMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 10.82% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 16.18% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 18.64% | -4.45% |
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than WOMN's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSZ vs. WOMN - Dividend Comparison
IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than WOMN's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 1.80% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF | 0.80% | 0.76% | 1.08% | 1.80% | 5.59% | 3.10% | 6.15% | 1.12% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSZ and WOMN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WOMN.
IQSZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.80% for WOMN.
IQSZ is categorized as ESG, while WOMN is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.75% for WOMN.
Find the right allocation for IQSZ and WOMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer