IQSZ vs. IVRA
IQSZ (Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF) and IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) are both ESG funds from Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQSZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IVRA.
Performance
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQSZ
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 28.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVRA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 13.58% | 13.36% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSZ and IVRA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSZ vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank
IQSZ
IVRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQSZ | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSZ | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSZ | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.07% | — | — |
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSZ vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison
IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 1.77% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.80% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSZ and IVRA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.77% for IQSZ.
Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.59% for IVRA.
Find the right allocation for IQSZ and IVRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer