IQSZ vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IQSZ (Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSZ is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. IQSZ is actively managed, while XLG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

IQSZ vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSZ achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 5.12% return.

IQSZ

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 12.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 26.38%
• 3Y*: 23.54%
• 5Y*: 15.71%
• 10Y*: 16.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSZ vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF	11.32%	13.36%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	5.12%	12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSZ and XLG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

IQSZ vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 53
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSZ vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQSZ	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.14	0.62	+1.52

Drawdowns

IQSZ vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSZ drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSZ and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSZ	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-52.39%	+43.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-3.68%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-7.64%	+6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IQSZ	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	13.61%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	18.71%	-4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	18.86%	-4.84%

IQSZ vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IQSZ vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than XLG's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF	1.32%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.61%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSZ and XLG in my portfolio?

IQSZ and XLG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IQSZ or XLG?

On fees, IQSZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSZ or XLG?

IQSZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQSZ or XLG?

IQSZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.

What is the main difference between IQSZ and XLG?

IQSZ is categorized as ESG, while XLG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.20% for XLG.