IQSI vs. ICOW
IQSI (IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IQSI tracks the IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index while ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQSI returned 7.66%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
IQSI vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSI achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.
IQSI
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSI vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSI IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF | 9.26% | 26.95% | 4.84% | 16.21% | -14.76% | 12.70% | 10.36% | 0.27% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | -0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSI and ICOW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IQSI and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQSI vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSI
ICOW
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Financial Services
IQSI
ICOW
-
Industrials
IQSI
ICOW
Technology
IQSI
ICOW
Healthcare
IQSI
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
IQSI
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
IQSI
ICOW
Basic Materials
IQSI
ICOW
Communication Services
IQSI
ICOW
Utilities
IQSI
ICOW
-
Real Estate
IQSI
ICOW
-
Energy
IQSI
ICOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSI vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
IQSI
ICOW
IQSI vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.50 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 4.91 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 17.54 | -11.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.87 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IQSI vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSI drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSI and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.90% | -43.49% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.00% | -8.02% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -14.81% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.86% | -28.48% | -1.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.64% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -7.59% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.24% | +1.03% |
Volatility
IQSI vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 4.41%. This indicates that IQSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 4.41% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 10.59% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 13.73% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 16.64% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 18.47% | +0.53% |
IQSI vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSI vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
IQSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
IQSI IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF | 2.50% | 2.75% | 2.79% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.75% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSI and ICOW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQSI has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSI dropped -31.90% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 7.66% for IQSI. On fees, IQSI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
IQSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.
IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSI and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSI and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer