PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSI vs. BBIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSI vs. BBIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IQSI having a 9.93% return and BBIN slightly lower at 9.46%.


IQSI

1D
0.61%
1M
3.82%
YTD
9.93%
6M
11.88%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

BBIN

1D
0.76%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.46%
6M
11.52%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSI vs. BBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
9.93%26.95%4.84%16.21%-14.76%12.70%10.36%0.27%
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
9.46%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSI and BBIN is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.96

The correlation between IQSI and BBIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSI vs. BBIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSI
BBIN

Financial Services

22.2%
24.8%

Industrials

16.8%
16.6%

Technology

15.9%
12.5%

Healthcare

13.2%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
5.9%

Basic Materials

5.6%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.2%

Utilities

4.0%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.3%

Energy

0.9%
3.0%

Financial Services

IQSI
22.2%
BBIN
24.8%

Industrials

IQSI
16.8%
BBIN
16.6%

Technology

IQSI
15.9%
BBIN
12.5%

Healthcare

IQSI
13.2%
BBIN
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSI
7.6%
BBIN
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

IQSI
6.0%
BBIN
5.9%

Basic Materials

IQSI
5.6%
BBIN
5.0%

Communication Services

IQSI
4.1%
BBIN
3.2%

Utilities

IQSI
4.0%
BBIN
1.7%

Real Estate

IQSI
2.3%
BBIN
0.3%

Energy

IQSI
0.9%
BBIN
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSI vs. BBIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSI
IQSI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IQSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSI vs. BBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSIBBINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.90

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

7.05

-1.18

IQSI vs. BBIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the BBIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSI and BBIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSIBBINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.41

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.54

-0.03

Drawdowns

IQSI vs. BBIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSI drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, roughly equal to the maximum BBIN drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSI and BBIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSIBBINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-33.37%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-11.57%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-13.98%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.86%

-29.24%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-1.04%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-6.30%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.11%

+0.16%

Volatility

IQSI vs. BBIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) is 4.75%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that IQSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSIBBINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

5.04%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

12.79%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

15.56%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

16.57%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

19.12%

-0.12%

IQSI vs. BBIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBIN's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IQSI vs. BBIN - Dividend Comparison

IQSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than BBIN's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.61%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
2.49%2.75%2.79%2.98%2.89%2.75%1.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IQSI and BBIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBIN has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to IQSI (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSI dropped -31.90% vs BBIN's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, BBIN leads with 8.67% vs 7.79% for IQSI. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IQSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBIN has performed better with a 8.67% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IQSI.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.49% for IQSI.

IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index, while BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSI and 0.07% for BBIN.

BBIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSI and BBIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer