IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE
IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds tracking the FTSE China 50, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE returned 2.04%/yr vs 4.72%/yr for DBX9.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DBX9.DE.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -14.67% return, which is significantly lower than DBX9.DE's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE has underperformed DBX9.DE with an annualized return of 2.04%, while DBX9.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.72% annualized return.
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -13.80%
- 1Y
- -10.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- -4.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -14.67% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.32% | -13.37% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 18.05% | -9.09% | 18.68% |
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 15.56% | 10.03% | 37.71% | -16.44% | -13.64% | -14.99% | -0.86% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and DBX9.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2007 | 0.95 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IQQC.DE and DBX9.DE has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.95, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQC.DE
DBX9.DE
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQC.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.42 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 5.97 | -6.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 15.49 | -16.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.88%, roughly equal to the maximum DBX9.DE drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and DBX9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQC.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.88% | -66.51% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -6.62% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -27.85% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.35% | -47.60% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | -53.99% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.29% | -10.16% | -20.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | -29.44% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 2.55% | +5.56% |
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) at 5.99%. This indicates that IQQC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBX9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQC.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.99% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 11.34% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 16.50% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 27.23% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 24.52% | +0.52% |
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DBX9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.94% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQC.DE and DBX9.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
Both ETFs track FTSE China 50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQC.DE and DBX9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer