IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE).
IQQC.DE and 36BZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQC.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. 36BZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. Both IQQC.DE and 36BZ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IQQC.DE or 36BZ.DE.
Key characteristics
| IQQC.DE | 36BZ.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 33.27% | 19.80% |
| 1Y Return | 21.26% | 13.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.95% | -6.42% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.96% | 2.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 0.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.23 | 0.99 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.38 | 0.32 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.86 | 1.67 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.30% | 8.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.97% | 26.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.50% | -53.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.04% | -25.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a 33.27% return, which is significantly higher than 36BZ.DE's 19.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQC.DE nor 36BZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 2.36% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than 36BZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and 36BZ.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) have volatilities of 12.00% and 12.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.