IPOS vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IPOS is passively managed, while MCSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IPOS returned 12.33%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for MCSE. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

IPOS vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 32.73% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.

IPOS

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -8.90%
• 6M: 16.48%
• YTD: 32.73%
• 1Y: 48.11%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: -7.18%
• 10Y*: 2.37%
• ALL TIME*: 1.63%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	$55.92K	$63.26K	$109.96K
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IPOS vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	32.73%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	26.85%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-9.46%	14.86%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOS and MCSE is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between IPOS and MCSE has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IPOS vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPOS	MCSE
Technology	46.6%	31.1%
Healthcare	17.7%	20.1%
Industrials	14.5%	18.1%
Financial Services	7.5%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	5.0%
Energy	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.4%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	13.8%
Utilities	3.1%	-
Communication Services	0.3%	4.7%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

IPOS vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 61
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 19
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPOS vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPOS	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	0.37	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	0.58	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.10	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	0.37	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	0.92	+6.22

IPOS vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOS and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPOS vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than MCSE's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPOS	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.09%	-26.36%	-46.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.27%	-10.42%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.44%	-26.36%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.60%	-10.51%	-33.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.09%	-8.79%	-23.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	4.36%	+2.27%

Volatility

IPOS vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPOS	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.88%	0.00%	+10.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.55%	1.91%	+29.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.20%	10.71%	+23.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.15%	19.08%	+9.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.60%	19.08%	+5.52%

IPOS vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPOS vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.35%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPOS and MCSE in my portfolio?

IPOS and MCSE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPOS or MCSE?

IPOS has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, IPOS or MCSE?

On 3-year performance, IPOS leads with 12.33% vs -0.12% for MCSE. On fees, MCSE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPOS or MCSE?

Over the 3-year period, IPOS has performed better with a 12.33% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPOS or MCSE?

MCSE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPOS or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.35% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between IPOS and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.