MCSE vs. CIL

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. MCSE is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MCSE returned 0.74%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for CIL. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MCSE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

MCSE vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.05%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 14.70%
• 3Y*: 15.35%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MCSE vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-9.46%	14.86%	10.04%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSE and CIL is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022	0.73

The correlation between MCSE and CIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

MCSE vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MCSE	CIL
Technology	31.1%	6.4%
Healthcare	20.1%	7.7%
Industrials	18.1%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	8.2%
Basic Materials	5.1%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	8.8%
Communication Services	4.7%	5.8%
Financial Services	2.1%	24.8%
Energy	-	4.6%
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Utilities	-	6.6%

Return for Risk

MCSE vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 17
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 89
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCSE vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCSE	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	2.30	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	3.48	-2.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.61	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	3.34	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.92	16.65	-15.73

MCSE vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSE and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCSE vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSE drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSE and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCSE	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.36%	-36.27%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-4.60%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.36%	-11.29%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.51%	-0.58%	-9.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-6.46%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	1.04%	+3.35%

Volatility

MCSE vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) is 0.00%, while VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) has a volatility of 0.00%. This indicates that MCSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCSE	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.82%	1.91%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.22%	6.67%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	16.39%	+2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	16.74%	+2.31%

MCSE vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCSE vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

MCSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.05%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCSE and CIL in my portfolio?

MCSE and CIL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCSE or CIL?

CIL has higher volatility (0.00%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSE dropped -26.36% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, MCSE or CIL?

On 3-year performance, CIL leads with 15.35% vs 0.74% for MCSE. On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MCSE or CIL?

Over the 3-year period, CIL has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCSE or CIL?

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCSE or CIL?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

What is the main difference between MCSE and CIL?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCSE and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.