IPOS vs. KEMX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPOS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Renaissance International IPO Index, while KEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPOS returned -7.18%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for KEMX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

IPOS vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 32.73% return, which is significantly higher than KEMX's 29.19% return.

IPOS

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -8.90%
• 6M: 16.48%
• YTD: 32.73%
• 1Y: 48.11%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: -7.18%
• 10Y*: 2.37%
• ALL TIME*: 1.63%

KEMX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -4.84%
• 6M: 16.27%
• YTD: 29.19%
• 1Y: 54.76%
• 3Y*: 23.72%
• 5Y*: 12.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	$55.92K	$63.26K	$109.96K
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	$479.51K	$502.15K	$570.21K

IPOS vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	32.73%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-30.62%	50.71%	13.25%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	29.19%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOS and KEMX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019	0.63

The correlation between IPOS and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPOS vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPOS	KEMX
Technology	46.6%	46.4%
Healthcare	17.7%	1.5%
Industrials	14.5%	7.5%
Financial Services	7.5%	20.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	2.7%
Energy	4.9%	3.6%
Basic Materials	4.4%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	4.9%
Utilities	3.1%	1.6%
Communication Services	0.3%	3.0%
Real Estate	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

IPOS vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 61
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 83
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPOS vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPOS	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.01	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.56	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	3.37	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	10.68	-3.54

IPOS vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOS and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPOS vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPOS	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.09%	-38.80%	-34.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.27%	-16.11%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.44%	-19.62%	-11.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.41%	-30.85%	-36.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.60%	-12.07%	-31.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.09%	-8.82%	-23.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	5.07%	+1.56%

Volatility

IPOS vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) at 9.57%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPOS	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.88%	9.57%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.55%	24.95%	+6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.20%	26.95%	+7.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.15%	19.41%	+8.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.60%	21.51%	+3.09%

IPOS vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPOS vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than KEMX's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.35%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.54%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPOS and KEMX in my portfolio?

IPOS and KEMX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPOS or KEMX?

IPOS has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to KEMX (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, IPOS or KEMX?

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 12.35% vs -7.18% for IPOS. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KEMX has been the lower-risk option at 9.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPOS or KEMX?

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 12.35% return vs -7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPOS or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPOS or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.35% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between IPOS and KEMX?

IPOS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KEMX is Emerging Markets Equities. IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.