PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPO vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPO vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 13.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 10.14%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.


IPO

1D
-2.11%
1M
-11.04%
6M
14.70%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
-3.83%
10Y*
10.14%
ALL TIME*
8.05%

VXF

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.91%
6M
10.93%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$994.90K$1.09M$2.23M
$71.64M$76.55M$103.41M

IPO vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
12.19%5.45%15.68%52.55%-57.26%-10.31%107.88%34.11%-17.24%37.16%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
13.55%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IPO and VXF is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013

0.80

The correlation between IPO and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPO vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPO
VXF

Technology

43.6%
19.2%

Healthcare

13.0%
13.6%

Industrials

12.5%
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.5%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.8%

Financial Services

6.3%
13.7%

Real Estate

4.1%
5.6%

Energy

3.1%
4.3%

Utilities

0.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.7%

Technology

IPO
43.6%
VXF
19.2%

Healthcare

IPO
13.0%
VXF
13.6%

Industrials

IPO
12.5%
VXF
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IPO
9.6%
VXF
8.5%

Communication Services

IPO
6.6%
VXF
2.8%

Financial Services

IPO
6.3%
VXF
13.7%

Real Estate

IPO
4.1%
VXF
5.6%

Energy

IPO
3.1%
VXF
4.3%

Utilities

IPO
0.9%
VXF
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IPO
0.3%
VXF
2.6%

Basic Materials

IPO

-

VXF
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPO vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPO vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPOVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.04

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

6.94

-5.97

IPO vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPO vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than VXF's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-58.03%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.24%

-10.21%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.04%

-26.92%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-36.39%

-29.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

-41.72%

-27.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.21%

-4.08%

-28.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.97%

-9.50%

-13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.07%

3.01%

+9.06%

Volatility

IPO vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) at 3.91%. This indicates that IPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

3.91%

+6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.49%

13.29%

+12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.90%

17.80%

+14.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.26%

22.38%

+13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.74%

22.27%

+9.47%

IPO vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPO vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VXF's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.46%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.03%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPO and VXF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPO has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to VXF (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 11.74% vs 10.14% for IPO. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.

VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.46% for IPO.

IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VXF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.05% for VXF.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPO and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer