PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPOS vs. FID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPOS vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 40.15% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.


IPOS

1D
0.43%
1M
10.58%
YTD
40.15%
6M
44.26%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
-7.69%
10Y*
3.00%

FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPOS vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
40.15%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-18.70%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOS and FID is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.52

The correlation between IPOS and FID shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPOS vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPOS
FID

Technology

42.0%
4.1%

Healthcare

16.2%
3.5%

Industrials

15.0%
13.5%

Financial Services

9.6%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.3%
4.3%

Energy

4.9%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.7%

Utilities

3.1%
17.4%

Communication Services

0.3%
11.5%

Real Estate

-

9.4%

Technology

IPOS
42.0%
FID
4.1%

Healthcare

IPOS
16.2%
FID
3.5%

Industrials

IPOS
15.0%
FID
13.5%

Financial Services

IPOS
9.6%
FID
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IPOS
7.1%
FID
4.0%

Basic Materials

IPOS
5.3%
FID
4.3%

Energy

IPOS
4.9%
FID
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

IPOS
4.7%
FID
3.7%

Utilities

IPOS
3.1%
FID
17.4%

Communication Services

IPOS
0.3%
FID
11.5%

Real Estate

IPOS

-

FID
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPOS vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPOS vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPOSFIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

2.62

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

9.14

+2.43

IPOS vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOS Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOS and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPOSFIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.30

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.46

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.39

-0.30

Drawdowns

IPOS vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and FID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOSFIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.09%

-39.79%

-33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-8.93%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

-10.97%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.93%

-29.13%

-40.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.44%

-1.11%

-39.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.99%

-8.47%

-23.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

2.55%

+3.12%

Volatility

IPOS vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOSFIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

3.00%

+9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.45%

8.12%

+18.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

10.16%

+19.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.19%

17.04%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

18.96%

+5.17%

IPOS vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPOS vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.68%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPOS and FID have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs FID's -39.79%.

On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs -7.69% for IPOS. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs -7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.60% for FID.

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPOS and FID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer