IPFCX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPFCX (Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, IPFCX returned 8.20%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPFCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund (IPFCX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPFCX achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.89% return.

IPFCX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.42%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 6M: 11.83%
• 1Y: 24.79%
• 3Y*: 14.58%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: 9.54%

PALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPFCX Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund	11.25%	16.22%	6.67%	6.64%	-1.31%	30.14%	4.29%	20.56%	-10.49%	5.76%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IPFCX and PALDX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.72

The correlation between IPFCX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IPFCX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPFCX

IPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 90
IPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
IPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund (IPFCX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPFCX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.20	2.73	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.83	3.92	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.52	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	3.62	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.28	17.16	+0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPFCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPFCX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPFCX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.20	2.73	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.79	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.81	-0.16

Drawdowns

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPFCX drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPFCX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPFCX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.10%	-26.16%	-5.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-5.96%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.33%	-16.06%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.33%	-20.47%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-4.09%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	1.25%	+0.24%

Volatility

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund (IPFCX) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.30%. This indicates that IPFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPFCX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	2.30%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.11%	6.18%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.05%	7.89%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.22%	12.11%	-0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.59%	12.69%	+0.90%

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPFCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPFCX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

IPFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPFCX Poplar Forest Cornerstone Fund	8.46%	9.41%	7.31%	4.20%	8.55%	12.98%	1.94%	7.73%	5.24%	2.35%	3.78%	4.78%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPFCX and PALDX in my portfolio?

IPFCX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPFCX or PALDX?

IPFCX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPFCX dropped -32.10% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.