IPDP vs. AMDW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

IPDP vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -7.20%
• 1M: 12.58%
• YTD: 176.01%
• 6M: 174.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	218.52%

IPDP vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPDP	AMDW
Industrials	45.1%	-
Financial Services	18.6%	-
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Technology	13.1%	27.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IPDP vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPDP	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-34.64%	+34.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.20%	+7.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-14.25%	+14.25%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPDP	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	83.41%	-83.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	83.41%	-83.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	83.41%	-83.41%

IPDP vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPDP vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	37.14%	34.78%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IPDP or AMDW?

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPDP or AMDW?

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPDP or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between IPDP and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.99% for AMDW.