PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAV vs. XLII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPAV vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAV achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than XLII's 11.30% return.


IPAV

1D
1.05%
1M
0.99%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.91%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLII

1D
0.39%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.30%
6M
10.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAV vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IPAV and XLII is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.64

IPAV vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPAV
XLII

Industrials

45.9%
93.8%

Basic Materials

30.5%

-

Communication Services

4.2%

-

Energy

1.0%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.3%

Technology

0.1%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

IPAV
45.9%
XLII
93.8%

Basic Materials

IPAV
30.5%
XLII

-

Communication Services

IPAV
4.2%
XLII

-

Energy

IPAV
1.0%
XLII

-

Utilities

IPAV
0.7%
XLII

-

Real Estate

IPAV
0.3%
XLII

-

Consumer Cyclical

IPAV
0.1%
XLII
0.3%

Technology

IPAV
0.1%
XLII
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

IPAV

-

XLII

-

Financial Services

IPAV

-

XLII
100.8%

Healthcare

IPAV

-

XLII

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAV vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAV
IPAV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IPAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAV Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XLII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAV vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPAVXLIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

IPAV vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPAV vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAV drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAV and XLII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAVXLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-10.10%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

0.00%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-1.30%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

Volatility

IPAV vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPAVXLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

12.12%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

12.12%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

12.12%

+5.80%

IPAV vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPAV vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XLII's 10.82% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IPAV and XLII have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPAV.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 1.12% for IPAV.

IPAV is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPAV and 0.35% for XLII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAV and XLII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer