IPAV vs. XLII
IPAV (Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF) and XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAV is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index, while XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. IPAV is passively managed, while XLII is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPAV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLII.
Performance
IPAV vs. XLII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAV achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than XLII's 11.30% return.
IPAV
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLII
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPAV vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF | 14.68% | 8.23% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.30% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAV and XLII is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.64 |
IPAV vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPAV
XLII
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
IPAV
XLII
Basic Materials
IPAV
XLII
-
Communication Services
IPAV
XLII
-
Energy
IPAV
XLII
-
Utilities
IPAV
XLII
-
Real Estate
IPAV
XLII
-
Consumer Cyclical
IPAV
XLII
Technology
IPAV
XLII
Consumer Defensive
IPAV
-
XLII
-
Financial Services
IPAV
-
XLII
Healthcare
IPAV
-
XLII
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAV vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank
IPAV
XLII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IPAV vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPAV | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPAV vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAV drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAV and XLII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAV | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -10.10% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | 0.00% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -1.30% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | — | — |
Volatility
IPAV vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAV | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 12.12% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 12.12% | +5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 12.12% | +5.80% |
IPAV vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPAV vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison
IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XLII's 10.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF | 1.12% | 1.29% | 0.31% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.82% | 5.47% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAV and XLII have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPAV.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 1.12% for IPAV.
IPAV is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPAV and 0.35% for XLII.
Find the right allocation for IPAV and XLII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer