PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONQ vs. WULF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IONQ vs. WULF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a 28.93% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 126.81% return.


IONQ

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.69%
YTD
28.93%
6M
14.90%
1Y
49.44%
3Y*
75.90%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*

WULF

1D
2.80%
1M
12.72%
YTD
126.81%
6M
81.86%
1Y
511.74%
3Y*
163.16%
5Y*
23.22%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONQ vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
28.93%7.42%237.13%259.13%-79.34%50.11%
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
126.81%103.00%135.83%260.58%-95.58%77.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IONQ and WULF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IONQ:

$21.48B

WULF:

$11.02B

EPS

IONQ:

$0.86

WULF:

-$2.55

PS Ratio

IONQ:

99.37

WULF:

62.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

IONQ:

$187.12M

WULF:

$168.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IONQ:

$71.25M

WULF:

$107.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

IONQ:

$405.86M

WULF:

-$132.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONQ vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

WULF
WULF Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
WULF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WULF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
WULF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
WULF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WULF Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONQ vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IONQWULFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.51

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

16.26

-15.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

43.34

-42.00

IONQ vs. WULF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the WULF Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONQ and WULF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IONQ vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, smaller than the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and WULF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONQWULFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-98.50%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.61%

-31.74%

-35.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.61%

-75.77%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.00%

-98.50%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.53%

-27.75%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.88%

-46.66%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.20%

11.89%

+25.31%

Volatility

IONQ vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison

IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a higher volatility of 31.60% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 25.07%. This indicates that IONQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONQWULFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.60%

25.07%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.80%

65.58%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.28%

106.31%

-13.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.48%

127.55%

-27.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.53%

101.43%

-3.90%

Dividends

IONQ vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison

Neither IONQ nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%33.22%

Financials

IONQ vs. WULF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IonQ, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M20222023202420252026
64.67M
34.01M
(IONQ) Total Revenue
(WULF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IONQ and WULF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONQ has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to WULF (25.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONQ dropped -90.00% vs WULF's -98.50%.

WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONQ and WULF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer