IONQ vs. QBTS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS).

Performance

IONQ vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IONQ vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IONQ IonQ, Inc.	-35.75%	7.42%	237.13%	259.13%	-43.72%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-44.82%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-85.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IONQ : $10.64B QBTS : $5.09B
EPS IONQ : -$1.67 QBTS : -$1.08
PS Ratio IONQ : 67.59 QBTS : 193.58
PB Ratio IONQ : 2.80 QBTS : 5.98
Total Revenue (TTM) IONQ : $130.02M QBTS : $24.59M
Gross Profit (TTM) IONQ : $52.53M QBTS : $20.31M
EBITDA (TTM) IONQ : -$429.34M QBTS : -$345.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a -35.75% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -44.82% return.

IONQ

• 1D: 8.42%
• 1M: -24.86%
• YTD: -35.75%
• 6M: -53.12%
• 1Y: 30.63%
• 3Y*: 67.36%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

QBTS

• 1D: 11.17%
• 1M: -23.16%
• YTD: -44.82%
• 6M: -41.60%
• 1Y: 89.87%
• 3Y*: 179.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IONQ vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONQ

IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 71
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONQ vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IONQ	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.77	-0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	2.04	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.22	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	1.27	-0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	2.69	-1.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IONQ vs. QBTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the QBTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONQ and QBTS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IONQ	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	0.77	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.07	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between IONQ and QBTS is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IONQ vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IONQ nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IONQ vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and QBTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IONQ	QBTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.00%	-96.67%	+6.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.61%	-71.01%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.88%	-67.78%	+2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.36%	-66.49%	+15.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.67%	33.60%	-0.93%

Volatility

IONQ vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) is 16.38%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that IONQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IONQ	QBTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.38%	20.29%	-3.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.45%	77.91%	-11.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.73%	117.60%	-20.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	98.06%	152.02%	-53.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.99%	152.02%	-55.03%

Financials