IONQ vs. KMB
IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. IONQ operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, IONQ returned 40.49%/yr vs -0.92%/yr for KMB. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
IONQ vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a 28.93% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return.
IONQ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 28.93%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 52.88%
- 3Y*
- 75.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.49%
- 10Y*
- —
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
IONQ vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 28.93% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -79.34% | 50.11% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONQ and KMB is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021 | -0.05 |
Fundamentals
IONQ:
$21.48B
KMB:
$34.08B
IONQ:
$0.86
KMB:
$5.93
IONQ:
67.11
KMB:
17.26
IONQ:
99.37
KMB:
2.06
IONQ:
4.32
KMB:
18.98
IONQ:
$187.12M
KMB:
$16.54B
IONQ:
$71.25M
KMB:
$5.93B
IONQ:
$405.86M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONQ vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
IONQ
KMB
IONQ vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONQ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.87 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.67 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | -1.03 | +2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONQ vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONQ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -36.97% | -53.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.61% | -29.60% | -38.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.61% | -34.06% | -33.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.00% | -34.06% | -55.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.53% | -26.52% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.88% | -8.85% | -42.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.20% | 19.43% | +17.77% |
Volatility
IONQ vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a higher volatility of 31.60% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that IONQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONQ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.60% | 8.42% | +23.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.80% | 16.67% | +52.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.28% | 25.77% | +67.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.48% | 20.19% | +80.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.53% | 21.07% | +76.46% |
Dividends
IONQ vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
IONQ vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IonQ, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IONQ and KMB have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONQ has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONQ dropped -90.00% vs KMB's -36.97%.
IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONQ and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer