PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVZ vs. DNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVZ vs. DNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVZ achieves a -8.29% return, which is significantly lower than DNN's 37.97% return.


INVZ

1D
-3.85%
1M
16.58%
YTD
-8.29%
6M
-36.90%
1Y
-11.13%
3Y*
-36.39%
5Y*
-40.42%
10Y*

DNN

1D
7.00%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
37.97%
6M
41.70%
1Y
141.45%
3Y*
46.38%
5Y*
23.45%
10Y*
21.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVZ vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
-8.29%-49.22%-33.60%-35.62%-38.01%-34.97%
DNN
Denison Mines Corp
37.97%47.78%1.69%53.91%-16.06%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between INVZ and DNN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.28

The correlation between INVZ and DNN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVZ:

$168.62M

DNN:

$3.31B

EPS

INVZ:

-$0.39

DNN:

-$0.28

PS Ratio

INVZ:

3.62

DNN:

762.33

PB Ratio

INVZ:

2.83

DNN:

12.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVZ:

$44.83M

DNN:

$4.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVZ:

$4.34M

DNN:

-$12.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

INVZ:

-$73.94M

DNN:

-$155.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVZ vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVZ
INVZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
INVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DNN
DNN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVZ vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INVZDNNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

2.33

-2.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

2.83

-2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

4.43

-4.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.30

10.28

-10.58

INVZ vs. DNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVZ and DNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INVZDNNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

2.33

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.37

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

-0.07

-0.37

Drawdowns

INVZ vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVZ drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, roughly equal to the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVZ and DNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVZDNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.06%

-98.96%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.21%

-29.50%

-45.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.12%

-52.48%

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.43%

-55.66%

-39.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.66%

-80.97%

-12.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.81%

-85.07%

+10.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.82%

12.73%

+34.09%

Volatility

INVZ vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison

Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) has a higher volatility of 32.66% compared to Denison Mines Corp (DNN) at 15.70%. This indicates that INVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVZDNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.66%

15.70%

+16.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.71%

44.52%

+14.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.56%

61.20%

+31.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.01%

63.37%

+25.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.02%

64.17%

+24.85%

Dividends

INVZ vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVZ nor DNN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INVZ vs. DNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviz Technologies Ltd. and Denison Mines Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00M0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20222023202420252026
7.13M
795.13K
(INVZ) Total Revenue
(DNN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INVZ and DNN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INVZ has higher volatility (32.66%) compared to DNN (15.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVZ dropped -96.06% vs DNN's -98.96%.

DNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVZ and DNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer