PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVZ vs. CRDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVZ vs. CRDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVZ achieves a -28.50% return, which is significantly lower than CRDL's 10.09% return.


INVZ

1D
1.48%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
-28.50%
6M
-38.15%
1Y
-54.48%
3Y*
-38.32%
5Y*
-43.40%
10Y*

CRDL

1D
-0.94%
1M
-20.45%
YTD
10.09%
6M
5.00%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
-15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVZ vs. CRDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
-28.50%-49.22%-33.60%-35.62%-38.01%-34.84%
CRDL
Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A
10.09%-25.48%51.80%65.33%-72.43%-47.29%

Correlation

The correlation between INVZ and CRDL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVZ:

$131.46M

CRDL:

$105.27M

EPS

INVZ:

-$0.39

CRDL:

-CA$0.38

PB Ratio

INVZ:

2.20

CRDL:

8.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVZ:

$44.83M

CRDL:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVZ:

$4.34M

CRDL:

-CA$25.95K

EBITDA (TTM)

INVZ:

-$73.94M

CRDL:

-CA$34.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVZ vs. CRDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVZ
INVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
INVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDL
CRDL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CRDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVZ vs. CRDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INVZCRDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.01

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.45

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

-0.64

-0.45

INVZ vs. CRDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the CRDL Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVZ and CRDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INVZ vs. CRDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVZ drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, roughly equal to the maximum CRDL drawdown of -92.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVZ and CRDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVZCRDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.06%

-92.71%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.55%

-39.87%

-35.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.12%

-72.73%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.39%

-90.72%

-4.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.06%

-83.04%

-12.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.96%

-69.03%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.88%

28.09%

+21.79%

Volatility

INVZ vs. CRDL - Volatility Comparison

Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL) at 10.52%. This indicates that INVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVZCRDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.37%

10.52%

+5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.47%

40.08%

+18.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.81%

68.84%

+19.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.13%

87.06%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.68%

86.79%

+1.89%

Dividends

INVZ vs. CRDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVZ nor CRDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INVZ vs. CRDL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviz Technologies Ltd. and Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20222023202420252026
7.13M
0
(INVZ) Total Revenue
(CRDL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. INVZ values in USD, CRDL values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


INVZ and CRDL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INVZ has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to CRDL (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVZ dropped -96.06% vs CRDL's -92.71%.

CRDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVZ and CRDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer