DNN vs. CCJ

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a -15.56% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DNN has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 6.00%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a higher volatility of 13.78% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 9.67%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Denison Mines Corp and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.