PortfoliosLab logo
DNN vs. CCJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DNN and CCJ is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DNN vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DNN:

-0.55

CCJ:

-0.06

Sortino Ratio

DNN:

-0.49

CCJ:

0.28

Omega Ratio

DNN:

0.94

CCJ:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

DNN:

-0.35

CCJ:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

DNN:

-1.13

CCJ:

-0.07

Ulcer Index

DNN:

28.32%

CCJ:

20.12%

Daily Std Dev

DNN:

60.71%

CCJ:

47.20%

Max Drawdown

DNN:

-98.41%

CCJ:

-87.86%

Current Drawdown

DNN:

-87.94%

CCJ:

-14.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DNN:

$1.30B

CCJ:

$22.91B

EPS

DNN:

-$0.09

CCJ:

$0.41

PEG Ratio

DNN:

0.00

CCJ:

3.33

PS Ratio

DNN:

284.65

CCJ:

6.96

PB Ratio

DNN:

3.47

CCJ:

4.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

DNN:

$4.57M

CCJ:

$3.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DNN:

-$11.54M

CCJ:

$961.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

DNN:

-$64.44M

CCJ:

$800.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a -15.56% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DNN has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 6.00%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


DNN

YTD

-15.56%

1M

19.69%

6M

-33.33%

1Y

-33.33%

3Y*

10.39%

5Y*

30.54%

10Y*

6.00%

CCJ

YTD

1.52%

1M

31.71%

6M

-9.27%

1Y

-2.71%

3Y*

30.86%

5Y*

39.75%

10Y*

14.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Denison Mines Corp

Cameco Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DNN vs. CCJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DNN is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DNN is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DNN is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DNN is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DNN is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DNN is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCJ is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DNN vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DNN vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DNN
Denison Mines Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.22%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%

Drawdowns

DNN vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DNN vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a higher volatility of 13.78% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 9.67%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DNN vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Denison Mines Corp and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
1.38M
789.43M
(DNN) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items