PortfoliosLab logo
INVZ vs. DNA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between INVZ and DNA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

INVZ vs. DNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INVZ:

-0.17

DNA:

-0.63

Sortino Ratio

INVZ:

0.50

DNA:

-0.88

Omega Ratio

INVZ:

1.05

DNA:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

INVZ:

-0.22

DNA:

-0.73

Martin Ratio

INVZ:

-0.47

DNA:

-1.25

Ulcer Index

INVZ:

44.49%

DNA:

57.89%

Daily Std Dev

INVZ:

107.85%

DNA:

110.42%

Max Drawdown

INVZ:

-96.06%

DNA:

-99.10%

Current Drawdown

INVZ:

-92.63%

DNA:

-98.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVZ:

$181.06M

DNA:

$406.80M

EPS

INVZ:

-$0.46

DNA:

-$8.91

PS Ratio

INVZ:

5.23

DNA:

1.71

PB Ratio

INVZ:

1.68

DNA:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVZ:

$34.60M

DNA:

$237.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVZ:

$7.12M

DNA:

$174.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

INVZ:

-$63.64M

DNA:

-$384.69M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVZ achieves a -45.83% return, which is significantly lower than DNA's -29.23% return.


INVZ

YTD

-45.83%

1M

29.08%

6M

19.67%

1Y

-13.33%

3Y*

-42.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DNA

YTD

-29.23%

1M

-0.14%

6M

-20.11%

1Y

-67.12%

3Y*

-61.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Innoviz Technologies Ltd.

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

INVZ vs. DNA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INVZ is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INVZ is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INVZ is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INVZ is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INVZ is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INVZ is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DNA is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DNA is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DNA is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DNA is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DNA is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DNA is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INVZ vs. DNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current INVZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the DNA Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVZ and DNA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

INVZ vs. DNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVZ nor DNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

INVZ vs. DNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVZ drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, roughly equal to the maximum DNA drawdown of -99.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVZ and DNA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

INVZ vs. DNA - Volatility Comparison

Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) have volatilities of 26.63% and 25.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

INVZ vs. DNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviz Technologies Ltd. and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
17.39M
48.32M
(INVZ) Total Revenue
(DNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items