PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DNN vs. URNM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DNN and URNM is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

DNN vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
347.62%
285.89%
DNN
URNM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DNN:

-0.11

URNM:

-0.58

Sortino Ratio

DNN:

0.24

URNM:

-0.67

Omega Ratio

DNN:

1.03

URNM:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

DNN:

-0.07

URNM:

-0.63

Martin Ratio

DNN:

-0.36

URNM:

-1.18

Ulcer Index

DNN:

18.13%

URNM:

19.50%

Daily Std Dev

DNN:

56.28%

URNM:

39.27%

Max Drawdown

DNN:

-98.41%

URNM:

-42.55%

Current Drawdown

DNN:

-85.09%

URNM:

-26.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's 3.77% return.


DNN

YTD

4.44%

1M

-3.09%

6M

-3.59%

1Y

-4.08%

5Y*

36.64%

10Y*

7.91%

URNM

YTD

3.77%

1M

3.41%

6M

-8.37%

1Y

-23.15%

5Y*

30.78%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DNN vs. URNM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DNN is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DNN is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DNN is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DNN is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DNN is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DNN is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of URNM is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of URNM is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of URNM is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of URNM is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DNN vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DNN, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.11-0.58
The chart of Sortino ratio for DNN, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.24-0.67
The chart of Omega ratio for DNN, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.030.93
The chart of Calmar ratio for DNN, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.16-0.63
The chart of Martin ratio for DNN, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.36-1.18
DNN
URNM

The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and URNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.11
-0.58
DNN
URNM

Dividends

DNN vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


TTM20242023202220212020
DNN
Denison Mines Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
3.06%3.17%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Drawdowns

DNN vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and URNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-22.31%
-26.86%
DNN
URNM

Volatility

DNN vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) has a higher volatility of 19.20% compared to NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) at 10.30%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
19.20%
10.30%
DNN
URNM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab