PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
INTF vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

INTF vs. IFLO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

INTF (iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, INTF returned 25.86% vs 32.28% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INTF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

INTF vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.

INTF

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
9.92%
6M
9.49%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.36%

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTF vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF		9.92%14.50%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF		16.93%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between INTF and IFLO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.88

INTF vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
INTF
IFLO

Financial Services

26.5%
1.1%

Industrials

19.0%
18.1%

Technology

9.9%
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
13.8%

Healthcare

7.9%
11.7%

Basic Materials

6.8%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
2.8%

Energy

5.1%
12.1%

Utilities

3.9%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
6.7%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

INTF
26.5%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

INTF
19.0%
IFLO
18.1%

Technology

INTF
9.9%
IFLO
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INTF
8.5%
IFLO
13.8%

Healthcare

INTF
7.9%
IFLO
11.7%

Basic Materials

INTF
6.8%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

INTF
6.0%
IFLO
2.8%

Energy

INTF
5.1%
IFLO
12.1%

Utilities

INTF
3.9%
IFLO
1.0%

Communication Services

INTF
3.2%
IFLO
6.7%

Real Estate

INTF
2.5%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF

VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF

Often compared with INTF:
INTF vs. IDHQINTF vs. LRGFINTF vs. VFMFINTF vs. SPYINTF vs. DFAIINTF vs. IVLUINTF vs. DFIV
Often compared with IFLO:
IFLO vs. ABIIFLO vs. GLOWIFLO vs. EFASIFLO vs. CFAIFLO vs. CFOIFLO vs. FDTIFLO vs. AVDV

Return for Risk

INTF vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTF vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

INTFIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.74

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.43

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

—

—

INTF vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTF vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and IFLO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

INTFIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.39%

-6.44%

-33.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-6.44%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.64%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.39%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-3.37%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-1.25%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

—

—

Volatility

INTF vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

INTFIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

14.75%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.75%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

14.75%

+2.36%

INTF vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTF vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF		1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF		3.05%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

INTF and IFLO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 25.86% for INTF. On fees, INTF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INTF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

INTF has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTF and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer