PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSW vs. MTDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSW vs. MTDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 98.85% return, which is significantly higher than MTDR's 22.72% return.


INSW

1D
6.63%
1M
13.42%
6M
77.43%
YTD
98.85%
1Y
149.26%
3Y*
48.58%
5Y*
51.47%
10Y*

MTDR

1D
-0.08%
1M
-4.25%
6M
23.27%
YTD
22.72%
1Y
0.99%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSW vs. MTDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
98.85%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
22.72%-22.31%0.37%0.57%55.83%207.33%-32.89%15.71%-50.11%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between INSW and MTDR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between INSW and MTDR has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSW:

$4.38B

MTDR:

$6.38B

EPS

INSW:

$11.00

MTDR:

$3.89

PE Ratio

INSW:

8.05

MTDR:

13.19

PEG Ratio

INSW:

1.27

MTDR:

0.87

PS Ratio

INSW:

6.50

MTDR:

1.90

PB Ratio

INSW:

2.00

MTDR:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSW:

$675.87M

MTDR:

$3.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSW:

$274.33M

MTDR:

$3.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

INSW:

$525.75M

MTDR:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INSW vs. MTDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MTDR
MTDR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MTDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTDR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MTDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTDR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSW vs. MTDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INSWMTDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.04

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.38

0.06

+9.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.88

0.12

+25.76

INSW vs. MTDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSW Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is higher than the MTDR Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSW and MTDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INSW vs. MTDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum MTDR drawdown of -96.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and MTDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSWMTDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-96.50%

+39.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-28.76%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.40%

-46.83%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.40%

-48.29%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-24.81%

+23.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.78%

-25.07%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

14.27%

-8.42%

Volatility

INSW vs. MTDR - Volatility Comparison

International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a higher volatility of 16.78% compared to Matador Resources Company (MTDR) at 9.39%. This indicates that INSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSWMTDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.78%

9.39%

+7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.47%

30.06%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.18%

40.37%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.38%

47.08%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.41%

64.91%

-19.50%

Dividends

INSW vs. MTDR - Dividend Comparison

INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than MTDR's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
9.41%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
2.80%3.09%1.51%1.14%0.52%0.34%0.00%

Financials

INSW vs. MTDR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and Matador Resources Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
15.96M
671.64M
(INSW) Total Revenue
(MTDR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INSW and MTDR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to MTDR (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs MTDR's -96.50%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSW and MTDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer