PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOG vs. THO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HOG vs. THO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) and Thor Industries, Inc. (THO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOG achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly higher than THO's -28.53% return. Over the past 10 years, HOG has underperformed THO with an annualized return of -3.14%, while THO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.41% annualized return.


HOG

1D
-3.82%
1M
4.85%
YTD
22.71%
6M
20.30%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-9.61%
10Y*
-3.14%

THO

1D
0.21%
1M
-5.82%
YTD
-28.53%
6M
-30.78%
1Y
-13.13%
3Y*
-6.46%
5Y*
-5.73%
10Y*
3.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOG vs. THO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HOG
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
22.71%-30.05%-16.61%-9.76%12.13%4.29%0.19%13.62%-30.54%-10.29%
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
-28.53%9.74%-17.90%59.77%-25.57%13.26%27.97%46.47%-64.79%52.43%

Correlation

The correlation between HOG and THO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987

0.37

The correlation between HOG and THO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HOG:

$2.73B

THO:

$3.80B

EPS

HOG:

$1.96

THO:

$4.93

PE Ratio

HOG:

12.60

THO:

14.71

PS Ratio

HOG:

0.92

THO:

0.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

HOG:

$3.14B

THO:

$9.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HOG:

$994.65M

THO:

$1.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

HOG:

$386.96M

THO:

$489.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOG vs. THO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOG
HOG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

THO
THO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
THO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
THO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
THO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
THO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOG vs. THO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) and Thor Industries, Inc. (THO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOGTHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.97

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

-0.33

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

-0.66

+1.06

HOG vs. THO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the THO Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOG and THO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOG vs. THO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOG drawdown since its inception was -88.26%, which is greater than THO's maximum drawdown of -79.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOG and THO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOGTHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.26%

-79.55%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.24%

-39.83%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.74%

-48.40%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.11%

-48.40%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.28%

-76.94%

+3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.91%

-47.01%

-7.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-24.17%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.18%

19.79%

+3.39%

Volatility

HOG vs. THO - Volatility Comparison

Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) and Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) have volatilities of 11.12% and 11.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOGTHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.12%

11.67%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.19%

27.40%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.20%

38.11%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.43%

40.90%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.10%

44.38%

-1.28%

Dividends

HOG vs. THO - Dividend Comparison

HOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than THO's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOG
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
2.98%3.51%2.29%1.79%1.51%1.59%1.20%4.03%4.34%2.87%2.40%2.73%
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
2.84%1.97%1.53%1.57%2.33%1.62%1.74%2.13%2.92%0.93%1.26%2.03%

Financials

HOG vs. THO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Harley-Davidson, Inc. and Thor Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B202220232024202520260
2.78B
(HOG) Total Revenue
(THO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HOG and THO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THO has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to HOG (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOG dropped -88.26% vs THO's -79.55%.

HOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOG and THO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer