PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSM vs. WPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSM vs. WPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSM achieves a -43.78% return, which is significantly lower than WPM's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, INSM has outperformed WPM with an annualized return of 25.53%, while WPM has yielded a comparatively lower 20.59% annualized return.


INSM

1D
1.17%
1M
-17.07%
YTD
-43.78%
6M
-50.33%
1Y
1.00%
3Y*
71.44%
5Y*
26.62%
10Y*
25.53%

WPM

1D
3.05%
1M
-18.24%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
20.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSM vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
-43.78%152.09%122.78%55.11%-26.65%-18.17%39.41%82.01%-57.92%135.68%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-0.90%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-10.04%16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between INSM and WPM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.09

The correlation between INSM and WPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSM:

$21.08B

WPM:

$52.82B

EPS

INSM:

-$5.71

WPM:

$3.96

PS Ratio

INSM:

24.77

WPM:

19.23

PB Ratio

INSM:

29.91

WPM:

5.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSM:

$819.56M

WPM:

$2.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSM:

$668.55M

WPM:

$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

INSM:

-$1.14B

WPM:

$2.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INSM vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSM
INSM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
INSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
INSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSM vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INSMWPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

0.84

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

2.40

-2.36

INSM vs. WPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the WPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSM and WPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INSM vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSM drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSM and WPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSMWPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-48.64%

-50.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.54%

-34.92%

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.54%

-34.92%

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

-43.29%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.84%

-48.64%

-16.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.72%

-29.73%

-23.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.07%

-18.87%

-67.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.68%

12.22%

+11.46%

Volatility

INSM vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison

Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) have volatilities of 17.27% and 16.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSMWPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.27%

16.76%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.13%

39.19%

+6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.05%

45.96%

+6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.82%

35.44%

+37.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.49%

36.78%

+41.71%

Dividends

INSM vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison

INSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.62%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%

Financials

INSM vs. WPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Insmed Incorporated and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
305.96M
888.98M
(INSM) Total Revenue
(WPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INSM vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Insmed Incorporated and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.5%
77.5%
Portfolio components
INSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported a gross profit of 258.54M and revenue of 305.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.5%.

WPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

INSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported an operating income of -198.20M and revenue of 305.96M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.8%.

WPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

INSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported a net income of -163.56M and revenue of 305.96M, resulting in a net margin of -53.5%.

WPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INSM and WPM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSM has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to WPM (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSM dropped -98.65% vs WPM's -48.64%.

WPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSM and WPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer