INKM vs. POW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INKM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

INKM vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.98% return.

INKM

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 4.32%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 1Y: 11.85%
• 3Y*: 10.14%
• 5Y*: 4.34%
• 10Y*: 5.40%
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

POW

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -5.46%
• 6M: 18.56%
• YTD: 38.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	$356.13K	$216.66K	$250.22K
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.18M	$2.14M	$2.63M

INKM vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	7.48%	0.03%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.98%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and POW is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

INKM vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 75
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INKM vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INKM	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.30	—	—

Drawdowns

INKM vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, roughly equal to the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	INKM	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-28.02%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.34%	+18.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-5.66%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INKM	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.03%	34.48%	-28.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.31%	34.48%	-26.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.75%	34.48%	-24.73%

INKM vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INKM vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.74%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INKM and POW in my portfolio?

INKM and POW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INKM or POW?

On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INKM or POW?

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INKM or POW?

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between INKM and POW?

INKM is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.75% for POW.