INIVX vs. EKWAX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX).
INIVX is managed by VanEck. It was launched on Feb 9, 1956. EKWAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund | 9.59% | 165.88% | 14.37% | 9.67% | -13.77% | -14.23% | 40.91% | 38.15% | -16.01% | 13.06% |
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 8.92% | 163.65% | 21.28% | 8.83% | -7.75% | -11.00% | 24.40% | 40.35% | -12.83% | 9.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INIVX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than EKWAX's 8.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INIVX having a 18.77% annualized return and EKWAX not far behind at 18.20%.
INIVX
- 1D
- 7.01%
- 1M
- -19.57%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 29.50%
- 1Y
- 116.46%
- 3Y*
- 49.06%
- 5Y*
- 25.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
EKWAX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- -18.83%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 26.99%
- 1Y
- 114.34%
- 3Y*
- 49.72%
- 5Y*
- 27.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INIVX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INIVX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank
INIVX
EKWAX
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INIVX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 2.63 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.76 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.00 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.93 | 14.89 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INIVX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.63 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.86 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.34 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between INIVX and EKWAX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison
INIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than EKWAX's 1.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund | 5.49% | 6.01% | 7.45% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 11.70% | 3.66% | 2.87% | 3.76% | 6.40% |
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 1.10% | 1.19% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INIVX drawdown since its inception was -78.96%, roughly equal to the maximum EKWAX drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INIVX and EKWAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INIVX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.96% | -76.76% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -29.03% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -42.79% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | -49.23% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.57% | -19.01% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -32.85% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 7.81% | +0.06% |
Volatility
INIVX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) have volatilities of 17.13% and 17.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INIVX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.13% | 17.42% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.44% | 36.22% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.71% | 43.87% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 32.80% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.19% | 33.17% | +1.02% |