PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ING vs. LYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ING vs. LYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ING achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly higher than LYG's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ING has outperformed LYG with an annualized return of 18.20%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.


ING

1D
2.68%
1M
5.57%
YTD
19.42%
6M
18.96%
1Y
66.68%
3Y*
46.20%
5Y*
28.64%
10Y*
18.20%

LYG

1D
3.61%
1M
7.09%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.80%
1Y
45.62%
3Y*
46.79%
5Y*
23.04%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ING vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ING
ING Groep N.V.
19.42%91.12%12.25%31.88%-4.22%55.41%-21.66%20.03%-41.15%35.53%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
10.96%103.71%20.30%14.68%-9.47%33.81%-40.79%36.81%-28.35%30.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ING and LYG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001

0.63

The correlation between ING and LYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

ING:

€2.17

LYG:

£0.45

PE Ratio

ING:

12.95

LYG:

9.71

PEG Ratio

ING:

0.77

LYG:

4.86

PS Ratio

ING:

2.00

LYG:

0.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

ING:

€41.73B

LYG:

£65.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ING:

€40.40B

LYG:

£65.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

ING:

€9.28B

LYG:

£7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ING vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ING
ING Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ING Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ING Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ING Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ING Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

LYG
LYG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ING vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INGLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.02

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

5.46

+5.58

ING vs. LYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ING Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the LYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ING and LYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ING vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ING drawdown since its inception was -92.73%, roughly equal to the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ING and LYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INGLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.73%

-94.84%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.86%

-22.72%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.86%

-22.72%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.39%

-40.19%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.27%

-68.72%

-6.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-54.14%

+54.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.76%

-63.40%

+17.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.06%

8.38%

-2.32%

Volatility

ING vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ING Groep N.V. (ING) is 7.80%, while Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that ING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INGLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

8.77%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.50%

22.57%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

28.66%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.28%

32.15%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.91%

36.36%

-1.45%

Dividends

ING vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison

ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than LYG's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ING
ING Groep N.V.
4.61%4.78%7.65%5.86%7.16%5.09%0.00%5.92%2.63%3.28%4.24%2.58%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.48%3.19%5.44%5.23%4.92%2.70%0.00%5.04%6.63%6.81%5.17%2.11%

Financials

ING vs. LYG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ING Groep N.V. and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
5.82B
5.18B
(ING) Total Revenue
(LYG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ING values in EUR, LYG values in GBP

ING vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ING Groep N.V. and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
94.1%
100.0%
Portfolio components
ING - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.48B and revenue of 5.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.1%.

LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ING - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported an operating income of 2.26B and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

ING - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a net income of 1.56B and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ING and LYG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYG has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to ING (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ING dropped -92.73% vs LYG's -94.84%.

ING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ING and LYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer