ING vs. MUFG
ING (ING Groep N.V.) and MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Diversified industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, ING returned 18.73%/yr vs 19.25%/yr for MUFG. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ING vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ING achieves a 29.55% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 44.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ING having a 18.73% annualized return and MUFG not far ahead at 19.25%.
ING
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- YTD
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 62.42%
- 3Y*
- 43.47%
- 5Y*
- 31.75%
- 10Y*
- 18.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
MUFG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 26.82%
- YTD
- 44.33%
- 1Y
- 66.80%
- 3Y*
- 46.10%
- 5Y*
- 38.23%
- 10Y*
- 19.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.55M | $78.41M | $100.20M | |
| $77.45M | $78.72M | $67.45M |
ING vs. MUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ING ING Groep N.V. | 29.55% | 91.12% | 12.25% | 31.88% | -4.22% | 55.41% | -21.66% | 20.03% | -41.15% | 35.53% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 44.33% | 39.96% | 40.10% | 33.50% | 27.37% | 25.70% | -15.99% | 11.50% | -33.01% | 20.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ING and MUFG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2001 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ING and MUFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ING:
$99.78B
MUFG:
$253.41B
ING:
€3.06
MUFG:
¥214.92
ING:
9.92
MUFG:
16.77
ING:
0.59
MUFG:
0.61
ING:
1.64
MUFG:
3.10
ING:
€40.54B
MUFG:
¥13.21T
ING:
€39.23B
MUFG:
¥7.24T
ING:
€9.83B
MUFG:
¥3.34T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ING vs. MUFG — Risk / Return Rank
ING
MUFG
ING vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ING | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.90 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 11.62 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ING vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ING drawdown since its inception was -92.73%, which is greater than MUFG's maximum drawdown of -76.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ING and MUFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ING | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.73% | -76.75% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.86% | -17.28% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.86% | -26.56% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.39% | -32.81% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.27% | -57.62% | -17.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -2.81% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.59% | -43.30% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 5.79% | +0.28% |
Volatility
ING vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison
ING Groep N.V. (ING) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) at 9.02%. This indicates that ING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ING | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.38% | 9.02% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.06% | 20.02% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.59% | 26.37% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 29.28% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.31% | 27.62% | +6.69% |
Dividends
ING vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison
ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than MUFG's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ING ING Groep N.V. | 4.25% | 4.78% | 7.65% | 5.86% | 7.16% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 2.63% | 3.28% | 4.24% | 2.58% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 2.40% | 3.12% | 2.50% | 2.90% | 3.36% | 2.18% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.20% | 2.70% | 2.34% |
Financials
ING vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ING Groep N.V. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ING vs. MUFG - Profitability Comparison
ING - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a gross profit of 22.79B and revenue of 23.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.
MUFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09T and revenue of 3.59T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
ING - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported an operating income of 2.92B and revenue of 23.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
MUFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 841.39B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
ING - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a net income of 1.95B and revenue of 23.07B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
MUFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 624.99B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ING and MUFG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ING has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to MUFG (9.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ING dropped -92.73% vs MUFG's -76.75%.
MUFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ING and MUFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer