ING vs. AMAT
ING (ING Groep N.V.) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. ING operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while AMAT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ING returned 16.50%/yr vs 38.86%/yr for AMAT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ING vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ING achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 121.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ING has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 16.50%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 38.86% annualized return.
ING
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 50.69%
- 3Y*
- 41.50%
- 5Y*
- 26.65%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- YTD
- 121.28%
- 6M
- 119.38%
- 1Y
- 226.52%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- 38.86%
ING vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ING ING Groep N.V. | 12.04% | 91.12% | 12.25% | 31.88% | -4.22% | 55.41% | -21.66% | 20.03% | -41.15% | 35.53% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 121.28% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ING and AMAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1996 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ING and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ING:
$87.31B
AMAT:
$453.23B
ING:
€2.17
AMAT:
$10.61
ING:
12.05
AMAT:
53.45
ING:
0.72
AMAT:
6.80
ING:
1.86
AMAT:
15.67
ING:
1.48
AMAT:
18.96
ING:
€41.73B
AMAT:
$29.02B
ING:
€40.40B
AMAT:
$14.21B
ING:
€9.28B
AMAT:
$9.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ING vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
ING
AMAT
ING vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ING | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.59 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 10.67 | -8.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 30.41 | -22.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ING vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ING drawdown since its inception was -92.73%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ING and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ING | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.73% | -85.22% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.86% | -21.37% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.86% | -49.88% | +30.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.39% | -55.14% | +11.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.27% | -55.14% | -20.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | 0.00% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -38.78% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.06% | 7.49% | -1.43% |
Volatility
ING vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ING Groep N.V. (ING) is 8.43%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 20.52%. This indicates that ING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ING | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 20.52% | -12.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.45% | 38.83% | -17.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 49.03% | -22.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.29% | 44.20% | -12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 42.94% | -7.99% |
Dividends
ING vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than AMAT's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
ING ING Groep N.V. | 4.92% | 4.78% | 7.65% | 5.86% | 7.16% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 2.63% | 3.28% | 4.24% | 2.58% |
Financials
ING vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ING Groep N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ING vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
ING - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.48B and revenue of 5.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.1%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
ING - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported an operating income of 2.26B and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
ING - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a net income of 1.56B and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ING and AMAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMAT has higher volatility (20.52%) compared to ING (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ING dropped -92.73% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ING and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer