INFL vs. POW

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

INFL vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.

INFL

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -0.48%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 14.38%
• 1Y: 21.86%
• 3Y*: 19.26%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -7.03%
• 6M: 34.18%
• YTD: 41.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFL vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	14.38%	2.39%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	41.57%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between INFL and POW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

INFL vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 44
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 41

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFL vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFL	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	—	—

Drawdowns

INFL vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFL	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-18.37%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.79%	-16.82%	+9.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-4.40%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFL	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	32.91%	-16.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	32.91%	-15.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	32.91%	-15.27%

INFL vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFL vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.81%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFL and POW in my portfolio?

INFL and POW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFL or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFL or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFL or POW?

INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between INFL and POW?

INFL is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics LLC and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 0.75% for POW.