INFL vs. POW
INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INFL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
INFL vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 34.20% return.
INFL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 25.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.35%
POW
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- YTD
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.89M | $4.96M | $13.18M | |
| $1.23M | $2.16M | $2.93M |
INFL vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 15.98% | 2.39% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 34.20% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFL and POW is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFL vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
INFL
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INFL vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFL | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFL vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFL | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -28.02% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.50% | -21.15% | +14.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -5.60% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility
INFL vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFL | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 34.35% | -17.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 34.35% | -16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 34.35% | -16.76% |
INFL vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFL vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.80% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 0.91% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFL and POW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.
INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
INFL is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for INFL and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer