PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFL vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFL vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than HERD's 12.05% return.


INFL

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
17.21%
6M
17.82%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*

HERD

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.05%
6M
12.85%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFL vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
17.21%18.30%23.34%1.62%2.65%24.77%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
12.05%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between INFL and HERD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.67

The correlation between INFL and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INFL vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INFL
HERD

Energy

40.5%
15.9%

Financial Services

21.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

20.0%
4.7%

Utilities

2.9%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
8.2%

Industrials

1.8%
13.4%

Healthcare

1.2%
14.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.3%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.6%

Technology

-

18.0%

Energy

INFL
40.5%
HERD
15.9%

Financial Services

INFL
21.1%
HERD
0.0%

Basic Materials

INFL
20.0%
HERD
4.7%

Utilities

INFL
2.9%
HERD
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

INFL
2.4%
HERD
8.2%

Industrials

INFL
1.8%
HERD
13.4%

Healthcare

INFL
1.2%
HERD
14.7%

Real Estate

INFL
1.1%
HERD
0.3%

Communication Services

INFL
0.3%
HERD
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

INFL

-

HERD
15.6%

Technology

INFL

-

HERD
18.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFL vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFL vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INFLHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

5.19

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

17.73

-10.05

INFL vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFL and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INFLHERDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.54

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.56

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.63

+0.28

Drawdowns

INFL vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFLHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-39.41%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-5.68%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-18.90%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-21.60%

+0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-0.67%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-4.55%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.66%

+1.40%

Volatility

INFL vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 2.92%. This indicates that INFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFLHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.92%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

7.74%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

11.62%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.76%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

20.50%

-2.86%

INFL vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFL vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
3.13%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.91%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INFL and HERD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INFL has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFL dropped -21.30% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, INFL leads with 13.12% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, HERD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INFL has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HERD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.91% for INFL.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics LLC and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFL and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer