INFH vs. GRAG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and GRAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRAG.

Performance

INFH vs. GRAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFH

• 1D: -17.96%
• 1M: -59.76%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRAG

• 1D: -5.18%
• 1M: 12.59%
• 6M: -36.94%
• YTD: -51.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFH vs. GRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	-74.38%
GRAG Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF	12.16%

Correlation

The correlation between INFH and GRAG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	0.17

Return for Risk

INFH vs. GRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

INFH vs. GRAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than GRAG's maximum drawdown of -65.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and GRAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFH	GRAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-65.33%	-9.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.38%	-56.47%	-17.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.87%	-43.03%	+1.16%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFH	GRAG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	198.78%	70.42%	+128.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	198.78%	70.42%	+128.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	198.78%	70.42%	+128.36%

INFH vs. GRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than GRAG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFH vs. GRAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFH nor GRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFH and GRAG in my portfolio?

INFH and GRAG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFH or GRAG?

On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFH or GRAG?

GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFH or GRAG?

INFH and GRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between INFH and GRAG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.75% for GRAG.