PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAG vs. BEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRAG vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAG achieves a -53.46% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 619.73% return.


GRAG

1D
-0.84%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
-53.46%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BEG

1D
20.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
619.73%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRAG vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRAG and BEG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAG vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GRAG vs. BEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRAGBEGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.22

31.99

-33.22

Drawdowns

GRAG vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAG drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, roughly equal to the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAG and BEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRAGBEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.93%

-59.85%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.07%

-4.99%

-53.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.45%

-16.16%

-23.29%

Volatility

GRAG vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRAGBEGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.79%

214.06%

-145.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.79%

214.06%

-145.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.79%

214.06%

-145.27%

GRAG vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GRAG and BEG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

GRAG vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAG nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GRAG and BEG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRAG and BEG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

GRAG and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAG and BEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer