INFH vs. IWMY

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFH is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

INFH vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFH

• 1D: 17.48%
• 1M: -52.72%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

IWMY

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 8.15%
• YTD: 14.06%
• 1Y: 17.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	$1.99M	$2.39M	$2.98M
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	$684.21K	$768.65K	$1.05M

INFH vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	-70.81%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between INFH and IWMY is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	0.32

Return for Risk

INFH vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 42
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFH vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFH	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.87	—

Drawdowns

INFH vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -75.15%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFH	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.15%	-18.72%	-56.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.81%	-2.03%	-68.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.80%	-2.89%	-44.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFH	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	202.20%	16.21%	+185.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	202.20%	15.78%	+186.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	202.20%	15.78%	+186.42%

INFH vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFH vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

INFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	42.02%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFH and IWMY in my portfolio?

INFH and IWMY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFH or IWMY?

On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFH or IWMY?

IWMY is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFH or IWMY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 42.02%, compared with 0.00% for INFH.

What is the main difference between INFH and IWMY?

INFH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 1.05% for IWMY.