INFH vs. QTUM
INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFH is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. INFH is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
INFH vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFH
- 1D
- 17.48%
- 1M
- -52.72%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- 6M
- 19.81%
- YTD
- 28.87%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 40.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.99M | $2.39M | $2.98M | |
| $57.35M | $66.41M | $111.32M |
INFH vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -70.81% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | -15.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFH and QTUM is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFH vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
INFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
INFH vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFH | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFH vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -75.15%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFH | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.15% | -38.45% | -36.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.81% | -16.43% | -54.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.80% | -8.25% | -39.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility
INFH vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFH | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.20% | 30.82% | +171.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 202.20% | 27.50% | +174.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 202.20% | 27.58% | +174.62% |
INFH vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFH vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
INFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.84% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFH and QTUM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for INFH.
INFH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for INFH and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer