GRAG vs. NEBX
GRAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF) and NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for NEBX.
Performance
GRAG vs. NEBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRAG achieves a -58.07% return, which is significantly lower than NEBX's 457.23% return.
GRAG
- 1D
- -9.91%
- 1M
- -12.45%
- YTD
- -58.07%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX
- 1D
- -6.82%
- 1M
- 82.34%
- YTD
- 457.23%
- 6M
- 274.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRAG vs. NEBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRAG Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF | -58.07% | -7.82% |
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 457.23% | -24.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRAG and NEBX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRAG vs. NEBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRAG | NEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.25 | 1.99 | -3.24 |
Drawdowns
GRAG vs. NEBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRAG drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, smaller than the maximum NEBX drawdown of -77.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAG and NEBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRAG | NEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | -77.97% | +15.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.22% | -10.20% | -52.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -40.92% | +1.27% |
Volatility
GRAG vs. NEBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRAG | NEBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.83% | 193.00% | -123.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.83% | 193.00% | -123.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.83% | 193.00% | -123.17% |
GRAG vs. NEBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NEBX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRAG vs. NEBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GRAG nor NEBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRAG and NEBX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.
GRAG and NEBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRAG and 1.30% for NEBX.
Find the right allocation for GRAG and NEBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer