PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAG vs. NBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRAG vs. NBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAG achieves a -58.07% return, which is significantly lower than NBIL's 462.18% return.


GRAG

1D
-9.91%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
-58.07%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIL

1D
-7.17%
1M
83.16%
YTD
462.18%
6M
280.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRAG vs. NBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRAG and NBIL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAG vs. NBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GRAG vs. NBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRAGNBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

1.30

-2.55

Drawdowns

GRAG vs. NBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAG drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, smaller than the maximum NBIL drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAG and NBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRAGNBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.22%

-77.87%

+15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.22%

-9.98%

-52.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-44.90%

+5.25%

Volatility

GRAG vs. NBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRAGNBILDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.83%

199.38%

-129.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.83%

199.38%

-129.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.83%

199.38%

-129.55%

GRAG vs. NBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NBIL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRAG vs. NBIL - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAG nor NBIL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GRAG and NBIL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.

GRAG and NBIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRAG and 1.50% for NBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAG and NBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer