INEQ vs. SCDL
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Columbia, while SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). INEQ is actively managed, while SCDL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INEQ returned 13.46%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for SCDL. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.
Performance
INEQ vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 47.30% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 26.03%
- YTD
- 47.30%
- 1Y
- 61.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $606.92K | $766.57K | $703.44K | |
| $12.99K | $29.73K | $21.90K |
INEQ vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 12.10% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 6.93% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 47.30% | 2.05% | 14.99% | 0.18% | -13.06% | 52.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and SCDL is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between INEQ and SCDL has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
SCDL
INEQ vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 6.00 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 15.42 | -5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than SCDL's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and SCDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -34.87% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -10.19% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -32.79% | +18.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -34.87% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -2.42% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -11.68% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.96% | -1.00% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 4.27%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 8.22% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 15.67% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 21.95% | -8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 29.02% | -13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 28.76% | -12.39% |
INEQ vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.31% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and SCDL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCDL has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to INEQ (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs SCDL's -34.87%.
On 5-year performance, INEQ leads with 13.46% vs 11.62% for SCDL. On fees, INEQ is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, INEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, INEQ has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INEQ is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.
INEQ is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.95% for SCDL.
SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and SCDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer