INEQ vs. HAWX
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and HAWX (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. INEQ is actively managed, while HAWX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INEQ returned 9.70%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for HAWX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HAWX.
Performance
INEQ vs. HAWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than HAWX's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has underperformed HAWX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while HAWX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 24.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
HAWX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 40.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
INEQ vs. HAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 6.17% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 19.66% | 26.24% | 14.88% | 17.05% | -8.59% | 13.40% | 6.92% | 22.75% | -9.77% | 19.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and HAWX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between INEQ and HAWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
INEQ vs. HAWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INEQ
HAWX
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INEQ
HAWX
Industrials
INEQ
HAWX
Healthcare
INEQ
HAWX
Energy
INEQ
HAWX
Communication Services
INEQ
HAWX
Consumer Defensive
INEQ
HAWX
Consumer Cyclical
INEQ
HAWX
Basic Materials
INEQ
HAWX
Technology
INEQ
HAWX
Utilities
INEQ
HAWX
Real Estate
INEQ
HAWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. HAWX — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
HAWX
INEQ vs. HAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | HAWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.56 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 4.35 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 18.01 | -9.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. HAWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than HAWX's maximum drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and HAWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | HAWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -30.63% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -9.39% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -13.30% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -17.47% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -30.63% | -11.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | 0.00% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -4.27% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.26% | +0.50% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. HAWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.88%, while iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | HAWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 5.92% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 12.26% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 13.98% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 13.54% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 15.24% | +1.10% |
INEQ vs. HAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HAWX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. HAWX - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than HAWX's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.34% | 2.80% | 3.31% | 2.95% | 16.94% | 2.63% | 2.00% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.40% | 2.49% | 3.86% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.29% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and HAWX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAWX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to INEQ (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs HAWX's -30.63%.
On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.83% vs 9.70% for INEQ. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 2.34% for HAWX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.35% for HAWX.
HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and HAWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer