PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INEQ vs. HAWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INEQ vs. HAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than HAWX's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has underperformed HAWX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while HAWX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.


INEQ

1D
-0.53%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
6.17%
6M
7.02%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
9.70%

HAWX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.80%
YTD
19.66%
6M
20.07%
1Y
40.65%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INEQ vs. HAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
6.17%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
19.66%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and HAWX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016

0.73

The correlation between INEQ and HAWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

INEQ vs. HAWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INEQ
HAWX

Financial Services

24.4%
23.2%

Industrials

21.2%
14.2%

Healthcare

15.4%
6.8%

Energy

9.8%
4.8%

Communication Services

7.1%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
6.9%

Technology

2.9%
22.5%

Utilities

1.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

INEQ
24.4%
HAWX
23.2%

Industrials

INEQ
21.2%
HAWX
14.2%

Healthcare

INEQ
15.4%
HAWX
6.8%

Energy

INEQ
9.8%
HAWX
4.8%

Communication Services

INEQ
7.1%
HAWX
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

INEQ
6.7%
HAWX
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

INEQ
4.9%
HAWX
7.5%

Basic Materials

INEQ
3.9%
HAWX
6.9%

Technology

INEQ
2.9%
HAWX
22.5%

Utilities

INEQ
1.9%
HAWX
3.0%

Real Estate

INEQ
1.8%
HAWX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INEQ vs. HAWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INEQ
INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INEQ vs. HAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INEQHAWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.56

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.35

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

18.01

-9.10

INEQ vs. HAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the HAWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and HAWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. HAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than HAWX's maximum drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and HAWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INEQHAWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-30.63%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-9.39%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-13.30%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-17.47%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-30.63%

-11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

0.00%

-4.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-4.27%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.26%

+0.50%

Volatility

INEQ vs. HAWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.88%, while iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INEQHAWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.92%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

12.26%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

13.98%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

13.54%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

15.24%

+1.10%

INEQ vs. HAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HAWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

INEQ vs. HAWX - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than HAWX's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.34%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
9.29%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INEQ and HAWX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAWX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to INEQ (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs HAWX's -30.63%.

On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.83% vs 9.70% for INEQ. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 2.34% for HAWX.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.35% for HAWX.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INEQ and HAWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer