INEQ vs. AAAC
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Columbia, while AAAC is a CLO fund actively managed by Columbia. Both are actively managed. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.
Performance
INEQ vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than AAAC's 2.81% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
AAAC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.84K | $4.60M | $1.56M | |
| $606.92K | $766.57K | $703.44K |
INEQ vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 12.10% | 2.34% |
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF | 2.81% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and AAAC is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
AAAC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INEQ vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | AAAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and AAAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | AAAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -0.55% | -41.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -0.03% | -6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
INEQ vs. AAAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | AAAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 0.82% | +12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 0.82% | +14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 0.82% | +15.55% |
INEQ vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than AAAC's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF | 2.65% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.31% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and AAAC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 2.65% for AAAC.
INEQ is categorized as Dividend, while AAAC is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.20% for AAAC.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and AAAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer