INDQ vs. TRFK
INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Pacer, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. INDQ is actively managed, while TRFK is passively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.
Performance
INDQ vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDQ
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TRFK
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -11.82%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- YTD
- 39.43%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 40.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.77K | $11.88K | $46.17K | |
| $18.30M | $18.49M | $18.81M |
INDQ vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 2.93% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 43.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDQ and TRFK is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDQ vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank
INDQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRFK
INDQ vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDQ | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDQ vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and TRFK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDQ | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -29.06% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -19.65% | +13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -6.18% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.22% | — |
Volatility
INDQ vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDQ | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 35.52% | -16.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 30.56% | -11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 30.56% | -11.59% |
INDQ vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDQ vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison
INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDQ and TRFK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.
TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.
INDQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while TRFK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.60% for TRFK.
Find the right allocation for INDQ and TRFK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer