INDQ vs. PTNQ
INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Pacer, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. INDQ is actively managed, while PTNQ is passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDQ
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.77K | $11.88K | $46.17K | |
| $2.63M | $2.37M | $2.93M |
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 2.93% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 12.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDQ and PTNQ is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDQ vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
INDQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTNQ
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDQ | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDQ | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -28.07% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -8.54% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -5.67% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDQ | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 18.27% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 13.66% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 16.57% | +2.40% |
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDQ vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.84% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDQ and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.
INDQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.65% for PTNQ.
Find the right allocation for INDQ and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer